beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2012.11.21 2012고단930

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for a period of ten months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B, together with E and C on January 17, 2012, while drinking alcohol at the Fju on Jeju-si, around 23:10 on January 17, 2012, when E was able to take a knife the knife, the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

As a result, Defendant B jointly with Defendant A, when the victim was placed in a beer disease, which is a dangerous object, Defendant A putd up two-month medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. A report of investigation (the remainder except the face value of 19 pages and I statements of general investigation records);

1. Related photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act: Article 2 (2) and 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A for discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Determination on the issue of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A did not look at the victim at all, and Defendant B claimed that there was no fact that the victim was boomed with Co-Defendant A with the victim, even though the victim was sprinked in the stairs at the entrance of the above shop.

2. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the court’s adopted and examined evidence, the victim, immediately after the instant case, was sent to the hospital and received treatment from the head to the hospital, and thereafter, from this Court to this Court.