However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is the actual representative of the owner of the building of "F" comprised of two underground floors E in Daejeon-gu, five stories above ground, 6,830.06§³ above ground, neighborhood living facilities, and 18 households in multi-family housing.

Defendant

B is an employee of I, from April 2004, who has been working as a gas delivery source in K in the Daejeon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government JJ of the operation of I who is a liquefied petroleum gas dealer.

1. Defendant A’s above F building is a building for which approval for use has not been obtained.

No one may use or allow another person to use a building unless the use thereof has been approved.

Nevertheless, on May 8, 2012, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with L as to the above building 405 at the office of the building located in Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, with a deposit of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 300,000,000, and the contract period of the contract one year as to the above building; from May 19, 2012 to have L and his/her mother M move to the above L and his/her mother M move to the above place; and as stated in the “the current status of the occupants of the household of the F-building” of the attached Form “the current status of the household of the F-building”, the Defendant leased the above building for residential

Accordingly, the Defendant used the above building to others before obtaining approval for use.

2. Defendant B

(a) Where a liquefied petroleum gas dealer that violates the Safety Control and Business of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act supplies liquefied petroleum gas to users, he/she shall conduct safety inspections of his/her facilities and guide the users on matters necessary to prevent harm and injury, as prescribed by statutes;

Since the Defendant is a gas delivery agent of K, as a safety inspection agent of consumer facilities, he/she must perform the above duties.

The Defendant, from around 2009, delivered liquefied petroleum gas to a large number of households within the above F building, and each of the above households installs a liquefied petroleum gas storage container indoors, not outdoor, required for ventilation.