1. In full view of the purport of the argument in the evidence No. 2 and No. 3, the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant on May 2013 to the Plaintiff on May 1, 2013 on the following grounds: “I wish to repay the money in one month because I would like to do so with 30,000,000 won which would be paid in one month due to the Plaintiff’s pre-determined presumption; and the Plaintiff received 15,000,000 won and 22,50,000,000 won at each land owned by the Plaintiff; each land owned by Isan City and D with 22,50,00,000 won with maximum debt amount; each of the above collateral obligations is set up and borrowed money to F with 30,00,000,000 won; each of the above collateral obligations is actually used by the Plaintiff; and each of the aforementioned obligations is recognized to have been repaid to the Plaintiff on April 208, 2008.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 17,00,000 for tort damages amounting to KRW 24,00,000 for indemnity amounting to KRW 41,000 for indemnity amounting to KRW 41,00,000 for indemnity amount, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from April 18, 2015 to the date of repayment, as claimed by the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendant is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.