On September 15, 2016, around 19:20 on the front of the foregoing house, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly insulting the victim with the victim’s vehicle parking problems of the Defendant’s vehicle by stating that “I Y, I Y, I Y, I see, I see, I see, I see, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there is no insult as shown in the facts charged.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the victim was a police officer on September 15, 2016 from this Court to this Court on the ground that the victim was not a police officer on September 15, 2016.

On April 22, 2016, the defendant, who had already filed a complaint against the defendant as a crime of insult, had a record of not informing the police of the phrase "Do youth" from the defendant before the police arrive, cannot be understood. ② In addition, it is difficult to understand that the defendant and the victim are "Do youth" in the process of dispute over parking problems, and ③ The victim and the victim's deadly ties are different from each other about the time when the defendant expressed their desire, and in this case, E made a statement consistent with the contents of the victim's complaint in the previous case, in light of the relationship between the victim and E, the credibility of E's statement is insufficient, ④ The F who submitted a confirmation document to the investigation agency also prepared a confirmation document with any content in this court.