A. The Defendant was assaulted by E, and there is no fact at all when E was committed.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (two million won of fine) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The defendant alleged that there was no time from the investigative agency to the court of law that he did not know about the facts charged in this case, and thus, he denies the facts charged in this case. In other words, the victim appeared in the investigative agency and court of law as follows: (1) in order to recover KRW 10,000,000, which is equivalent to the taxi fee, the defendant called Doer; and (2) in the vicinity of the defendant's report on the urine, the defendant 10,000 won 10,000 won her face was prevented; (3) the defendant appeared in the court of law to the effect that it was difficult for the defendant to see that he was her face at that time; and (4) the victim appeared in the court of law as a witness at that time, and it is hard for the defendant to find that he was her face at that time, and (4) the victim was able to find out the credibility and credibility of the witness her face at that time.