채무부존재확인
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with B as to the C cargo vehicle.
B. On November 18, 2013, around 16:15, the instant accident occurred, driving of the foregoing cargo vehicle, and driving ahead of the road 125 Hong-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, on the side of the two branch office, along with the direction of pilotage distance.
There is a three-way road at the speed of 40km the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and the two-lanes are two-way lanes (the first lane is the left lane and the second lane is the straight lane), and the second direction is the opposite direction.
The defendant driving the off-to-land, and crossing the above road by courseing the central line in order to enter the alley road from the alley road to the alley road.
Alley residential house from the defendant is a one-way way allowed only for entry, and a one-way way in which the defendant tried to enter is a one-way way in which the entry is prohibited.
B proceeding about about 44.6 km each other of the above roads, while finding out the Defendant's ozone layer and leaving the steering gear to the right side in order to avoid this. However, from the two-lanes, the upper right side of the Obane was shocked by the upper right side of the above cargo vehicle.
Skidmark skimarks caused by the rapid operation are about 11.2 meters in total, and the distance from the beginning point of Skidmark to the point of collision is about 5 meters.
At the time of the accident, there was no defect or functional impairment in the structure of the cargo vehicle.
At the time, weather was milched with the surface, but there was no environmental factor in the road that could cause an accident.
C. After the accident, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the two pellleys, external cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism, and mathal typhism.
On June 1, 2016, with respect to the defendant, adult guardianship was commenced by the Seoul Family Court 2015-Ma9709, and E was appointed as the defendant's adult guardian.