업무정지처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The Defendant’s February 19, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
(2) The effect of the instant disposition is suspended ex officio until the instant judgment becomes final and conclusive, inasmuch as it is acknowledged that the validity of the instant disposition is urgently needed to prevent irrecoverable damage to the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to deem otherwise that the validity of the instant disposition might have a significant impact on public welfare due to the suspension of its validity.
3. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.