The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

1. On March 27, 2014, from around April 23, 2014 to around April 23, 2014, Defendant A visited the Internet 'C’ website, and deposited KRW 40,660,00 over 83 times in the new bank account (E) designated by the said site operator as the deposit account for gambling money, and received the game points equivalent to the same amount. Defendant A her game money by predicting the result of the sports competition and her predicted it, he/she was paid dividends according to the dividend rate, and carried out private sports entertainment in such a way that he/she was unable to return the game money that he/she left without being kept.

2. On March 27, 2014, from around April 23, 2014 to around April 23, 2014, Defendant B visited the Internet private sports entertainment site called “F” and received 40,175,000 won from the said site operator to the new bank account in the name of D (E) designated as the gambling fund deposit account and received 85 times the same amount of the game points. However, Defendant B saw the game money by predicting the result of the sports competition and putting it out, and conducted private sports entertainment in such a way as to receive the dividend according to the dividend rate if the prediction is significant, and not return the game money that he saw.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Application of statutes on specified financial transaction information;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine for Negligence);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act