However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. Around 01:40 on January 1, 2013, the Defendant entering a residence intrusion: (a) came to the house of the victim C, located in the Yannam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) opened an open door while under the influence of alcohol to the victim, who is one of the adjoining neighbors, and intrudes upon the victim’s residence.

2. Around 01:40 on January 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) went to a ward under the influence of alcohol as prescribed in paragraph (1) at the house of the victim C (the age of 54) located in the south-Naman-gun (around 01:40 on January 1, 2013); (b) the victim C, who was in a small room, was bread from a diving to a ward, was a brue to a ward; and (c) the victim, who was under the influence of alcohol, brudddd with a dangerous object in the room (a.e., 24 cm, 20 cm) while taking the victim’s bath.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of statement D in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to attachment of virtual photographs), investigation reports (victim C and hearing statements made by Victim D);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act that prescribes the choice of a punishment (the points of intrusion upon residence, the choice of imprisonment), Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the points of intimidation to carry a deadly weapon);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments in the above two crimes);

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the fact that a person commits a crime and reflects the fact that he/she has no record of criminal punishment, the fact that he/she agreed with the victims, the fact that he/she supports the mother of a

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Each of the facts charged

A. On January 1, 2013, the Defendant is a victim C (54 years of age) who is located in B in Yong-Gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Seoul, around 00.