If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On April 10, 2013, from around 01:20 to May 5, 2010, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the above C, by force, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant provided meals within the D restaurant operated by the victim C from around 01:20 to around 01:5 in calculating the food value; (b) the Defendant demanded the employees to issue cash receipts; (c) provided the Defendant with mobile phone numbers known to the Defendant; and (d) issued cash receipts on his mobile phone, but the details of issuance of cash receipts were not confirmed in its mobile phone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;