If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 5, 2018, at the front of the convenience store located in the Dongdong-gu, U.S., Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was urged by a taxi engineer and a guest to return home from her slope E and her policeman affiliated with the Dong-gu, U.S. police box of the Gyeonggi-do, the Dong-gu, U.S., Gyeonggi-do, by receiving a report from 112, to return home; and (b) took the bath to “Sero typ, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., g., e., g., e., g.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the E police statement;

1. G statements;

1. Photographs photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (verification of cell phone pictures on the face of suspect violence);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (Consideration of a penalty, the election of a penalty, the payment of a fine due to the insult of a police officer in 2014, the fact that there is no serious record of other serious crime, and the fact that no serious result of injury, etc. has occurred, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;