특수존속협박등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
around 20:45 on October 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) extracted knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif
around 02:30 on December 2, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 635,” was late from the house of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul E apartment 109 Dong 205, to the Victim G (48 years) who is a friendly son, at around 02:30 on December 2, 2016.
After finland, this was in dispute with each other, the head of the above G and the suspension of her head were shouldered, and the suspension of her loss was asked for the suspension of the victim F (the age of 84) who met this.
Thus, the defendant brought about about about two weeks to the above G, such as fingers, which require the above G to give medical treatment as well as the suspension of left hand, in which it is impossible to identify the number of days of treatment to the above F.
Summary of Evidence
"2016 Highest 3488"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. F's statement protocol 2017 senior group 635;
1. The legal statement of witness F and G;
1. Medical certificate (G);
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 257(2), 257(1)(F) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1)(G injury), 284, and 283(1)(F threat of carrying a deadly weapon) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for each of the following crimes;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation
1. The Defendant, at the time of committing each of the instant crimes, was physically and physically in a state of mental disorder due to dynamic disorder.
2. According to the records, the defendant is recognized as having received a mental therapy due to a polar disorder, etc., but the contents of the crime in this case.