If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

The defendant is a person who has been employed as a staff member of the 209-2 Caltha-dong, Gonam-dong, Gyeongnam-do.

On February 13, 2012, the Defendant reported the Internet loan advertisement provided in the loan brokerage of the Clin loan system, which entered into a business agreement with the victim (owner) of a credit service company on February 13, 2012, and applied for a loan on the Internet by 120,000 won per 39% interest per month.

However, the above facts did not have the intention or ability to pay every month loans even if they received the above loans.

The defendant acquired 2 million won from the victim company as a credit loan to the head of the Tong in the name of the workplace.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the head of a loan center, a complaint, certificate of remittance, application for loan, certificate of service, duplicate copy;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.