beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.05.02 2013고합829

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years and for two years, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Gohap829"

1. The violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) was committed by Defendant A while working as a victim E and a worker in G operated by F, the victim E and the general purchaser of F, around February 2010, Defendant A was employed by the high school-friendly I as the head of the general purchase department of H, and it was false as Defendant A received the order for the part of the heavy equipment from H on the ground that he was ordered by H, a person who is a person of processing.

The victims believed the horses of Defendant A as above, and produced the Master Mafin and Trafin each month from that time, but did not receive the products from the State H but did not cause the settlement of the price. Therefore, the victims demanded the settlement of the settlement to Defendant A.

Accordingly, Defendant A asked Defendant B, a branch, to go through the executive branch of H, and Defendant B contacted Defendant B with text messages, telephone, and e-mail at a number of times to the effect that the delay in the settlement of the price would be understood. Defendant A also tried to contact the victims as if he were I.

In addition, Defendant A acquired the aforementioned produced goods and introduced them to be disposed of on the secondhand goods, and sent to the victim F an order in the name of the State H, which was forged with Defendant B as described in paragraphs 2 and 3 below, and on August 17, 2010, Defendant A acquired KRW 8,000 in the market price of KRW 208,075,00 in the above G from August 17, 2010, and KRW 1,240,000 in the market price of KRW 1,240,00 in the cargo vehicle.

On September 2, 2010, Defendant A continued to practice 208,075,00 won in the market value of 208,075,000 won in the same way, and 3,000 of the debipine in the market value of 465,00,000 won in the cargo vehicle. Defendant A continued to practice 3,00 of the debipine in the cargo vehicle using the same method as of October 5, 2010, 5,000 of the market value of 208,075,000 won in the same way as of October 5, 2010.

In this respect.