However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 2017, the Defendant returned to the injured party B (n, 19 years of age) and approximately three months of age.

A person who is the former.

On February 5, 2020, from around 21:00 to the next 14:00 of the following day, the Defendant identified the victim's contact information through the victim's Face North-dong-dong-dong (Da graduate school dormitory E).

Then, the Defendant contacted the victim with the use of the Kakakao Kakakao Ma and sent the victim with his name as if the Defendant was the one who was unaware of the victim at all, and sent the victim’s photo to the bomer, and posted it on the F’s website. If the Defendant refuses to do so, the Defendant sent the victim’s photo by affixing his/her photo, and sent the victim’s photo with his/her name and sex-related video, and by threatening the victim, sent it to the Defendant by seven copies of the photograph taken by the victim’s body parts.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim to force the victim to transmit his/her photograph by affixing his/her photograph, and let the victim do an unobligatory act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the results of a cellphone digital siren search), CDs dialogue content, Kakakao Stockholm dialogue outputs;

1. Article 324 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Normal circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: The defendant recognized his/her mistake, and circumstances unfavorable to the defendant that the defendant was the primary offender: The crime of this case committed by the defendant was committed in the past.

The victim's contact with the victim with the victim by hiding his existence and repeating intimidation by making him the object of the accused's wrong sexual desire, the victim's emotional vulnerability is acquired, and the victim's emotional vulnerability is not chest.