Seized evidence 3 or 4 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

from the defendant.

On February 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and nine months for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Gwangju District Court on February 25, 201, and was on November 20, 201, and was not a narcotics handler at the Daejeon Prison on November 20, 2012.

1. At around 02:00 on August 31, 2013, the Defendant put about approximately 0.03 grams of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine, and injected them with water in the following arms, at the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan City C building 302.

2. At around 19:00 on October 14, 2013, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03 gramphones in the above Defendant’s home by the following methods.

3. On October 15, 2013, at around 16:10, the Defendant kept approximately 5.83g of philopon in the television bed in the front of the above Defendant’s house by dividing it into two plastic bed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Copy of the protocol of suspect examination of D by the police;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal made by the president of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. Notification of appraisal results of narcotics prepared by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office scientific investigation officers;

1. Investigation report (the process of seizure and attachment, etc. of photographs of seized articles);

1. Whether he/she has made a report on internal accidents;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of criminal records and investigation reports ( current status of personal identification and attachment of copies of written judgments);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics;

1. The defendant in the reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (based on the market price of 100,000 won for a single medication on a board) is again again during the period of repeated crime even though he was sentenced to a punishment for the same crime.