However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From November 2007, when the Defendant suffered from illness or injury to many insurance companies, such as Hansung Non-Life Insurance, KRB life insurance, and in the future, three life insurance, merts fire insurance, etc., he thought that he purchased an intensive insurance policy for medical expenses subsidized for medical expenses, and repeatedly repeated unnecessary hospitalization for a long time and claims for the payment of insurance proceeds.

Accordingly, from October 30, 2008 to November 6, 2008 of the same year, the Defendant hospitalized the E hospital located in the Southern-gun D with infectious infection, and submitted a written confirmation of entrance and discharge of the above hospital to the Korea Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. on November 10, 2008, and filed a claim for hospitalization expenses guaranteed by the victim’s non-paid comprehensive insurance product with no dividends of the victim company.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not undergo the first diagnosis or physical examination during the period of the above hospitalization, and did not undergo all treatment measures such as injection and medication, or observation by the medical staff. From time to time, a person who was locked at a house other than a hospital and was not in need of hospital treatment such as those who were staying outside the hospital, and did not undergo normal hospitalized treatment.

As above, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim company as if he had been hospitalized in a normal manner due to the need for hospitalized treatment; and (b) received KRW 240,000 from the victim as the cost of hospitalization around November 12, 2008; and (c) obtained the payment of KRW 240,000 from the victim; and (d) received KRW 43,069,786 from 8 insurance companies total sum of the nominal insurance proceeds, such as the cost of hospitalization, as stated in the annexed crime list, for 15 times of hospitalization.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of witness by the prosecution concerning some of the defendants' statements in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A copy of the claim for insurance proceeds, B accident list, current status of payments by insurance company, suspect insurance coverage details, accumulated status of suspect insurance coverage, payment of insurance proceeds, and other relevant matters;