The Plaintiff is the owner of the third-story building in the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”).

D and E respectively use part of the 1st floor of the instant building, as seen below, and the Defendant is the wife and the mother of D and E.

1) The Plaintiff is the right-hand shop of the first floor of this case. The Plaintiff is the right-hand shop of the first floor of this case (hereinafter “the right-hand shop of this case”).

As to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff submitted the lease contract (No. 1) that the Defendant entered as the lessee. The above lease contract is written on March 10, 2004, the deposit amount of KRW 2 million, and KRW 230,000,000,000,000,000 from the end of each month, and the lease term and the broker’s term of the lease term and the term of the broker’s term of the lease are in blank. (2) On the contrary, the Defendant submitted the lease contract (No. 1) as the lessor on the right-hand shop of the first floor of this case as the lessor, and as the lessee, D submitted the lease contract (No. 1) as the lessee.

On June 23, 2003, deposit is two million won, 230,000 won per month, 30,000 won per month, 240,000 won per month, the lease period is 24 months from the delivery date, and the broker is F.

3) Persons who actually occupied and used the right-hand shop of the first floor of this case are D. The Plaintiff and the Defendant submitted the same lease contract (No. 1-2 and No. 1-2) with respect to the left-hand shop of the first floor of this case among the buildings of this case (hereinafter “the left-hand shop of this case”).

On January 18, 2006, the contract date is 200,000 won per month (payment on January 20), the deposit is 20,000 won per month (payment on January 20), the real estate delivery date is written on January 20, 2006, and the lease term term term "lease term" and "receptor" are in public order.

2) A person who actually occupies and uses the left-hand shop of the first floor of this case is E. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 2, and No. 4].