2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

피고인은 2016. 10. 28. 13:40 경 서울 용산구 한강대로 23길 55 지하 3 층에 있는 이 마트 매장 안에서 사람이 없는 틈을 타 미리 준비한 니퍼를 사용하여 피해자 주식회사 이 마트 소유인 이불 커버 (DOA 스몰 스퀘어, 시가 89,000원 상당 )에 부착된 도난방지 태그를 제거한 후 이불 커버를 미리 준비한 캐리어 가방에 넣어 계산을 하지 않은 상태로 매장 밖으로 가지고 나왔고, 다시 매장 안으로 들어가 니 퍼를 사용하여 피해자 소유인 이불 커버 (SERAPY 레이첼, 시가 149,900원 상당 )에 부착된 도난방지 태그를 제거한 후 이불 커버를 캐리

In other words, it has been kept out of the store without calculating it.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment (a comprehensive selection of imprisonment with prison labor);

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be considered as favorable circumstances, etc. in consideration of the importance of sentencing):

3. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2 (2) of the Criminal Act for observing and observing protection.

1. Recommendation and sentence of the sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months and eight months (the scope of recommended punishment] for general property, one category (the theft, such as abandoned water, etc.) for the aggravated area (4 months to eight months) for the theft;

1. Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant was convicted of having been sentenced six times to imprisonment for the same kind of crime from 2000 to 2008, and even if he had been sentenced to suspension of indictment or a fine after he committed the same crime, he/she committed the crime in this case at the same time;

1. favorable circumstances: Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of a crime, circumstance after a crime, etc., by stating that the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, the damage is not large, and the damage is deemed to have been fully recovered.