A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for five months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

[2016 Highest 2389] Defendant A served as the site warden of the victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”), and Defendant B served as the deputy head of the victim C.

1. The Defendants conspired to have one half of the proceeds by arbitrarily disposing of construction materials remaining after the completion of the construction work at the site of the new construction of the victim C’s factory in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City.

On October 11, 2015, Defendants: (a) impliedly agreed on the removal of steel bars, which are construction materials, Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant A used 6 tons near 19m iron bars (market price of approximately KRW 2,850,000) owned by the victim C and carried them into a truck operated by non-personalized persons.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to steals the victim C’s property.

2. The single crime committed by Defendant A;

A. On October 16, 2015, at around 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) loaded approximately 5.5 tons of steel bars, the victim C, at around 19m in the same manner as above, onto a truck, and stolen them.

B. On October 24, 2015, at around 14:00 around 14:0, the Defendant stolen approximately 10 tons of steel nearby 13 meters (market price approximately KRW 4,800,00) on a truck by the same method as the above.

[2016 Highest 2687] Defendant A worked as an employee of the victim C in the third floor of the building building in Ulsan-gu E from October 23, 2013, and took overall control of the construction site at the site of the construction site of the FM factory in Gangseo-gu Busan, which the victim C received from F from F from August 2015 to December 2015.

Defendant

B served as a victim C’s employee from April 201 to August 2015, 201, and from August 2015 to January 2016, B was responsible for assisting the head of the field office in the construction site of the FM factory to the deputy head at the site of the FM factory construction site.

3. Defendant A’s occupational breach of trust is at the work site of the victim C’s employees’ interest.