2. The judgment of the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against the mistake, and that the Defendant agreed with G and U, the thief victim.

However, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to be unfair because the defendant committed a special larceny over two occasions and illegally uses another person's resident registration certificate, thereby driving an automobile without a driver's license, and the nature of the crime is very poor. The defendant already committed each of the crimes of this case even though he had been sentenced to a fine and imprisonment for the same kind of criminal offense such as theft, etc., and there is no new change of circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no other change of circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., the defendant's argument of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.