beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.10.25 2016고단1139

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등

Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

However, the above punishment against Defendant A for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On March 31, 2016, the same year is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two years of suspended sentence for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. in support of the Daejeon District Court.

4. 8. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant C and Defendant B conspired, and the same year from July 23, 2015

9. From the time of May, 15, Defendant C advertised F building Nos. 409, 707, 708, and 606 of the former G building Nos. 706, and 305 of the former H building No. 305 of the same Gu H building No. 305 of the same Gu, and Defendant C advertised to “I” the Internet site “J”. Defendant B, as the chief of office, was in charge of guiding customers and managing female employees, employed female employees, including K, after receiving KRW 150,000 from male customers who found there, and paid KRW 1,00,000 among them to female employees, and had female employees have sexual intercourse with customers, thereby engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.

2. Defendant C deposited KRW 500,00 in advertisement fees with L’s account at the time, place, and in the name of “J” in the above Internet site “I”, and advertised the business place where sexual traffic is conducted, such as commercial sex acts or arrangement of commercial sex acts, by inserting an advertisement stating the photograph, introduction, price, options, etc. of the employees involved in sexual traffic in the said Internet site “J”.

3. Defendants A and B conspired with the Defendant from Sep. 2, 2015 to Dec. 17:00 of the same year, from Sep. 2, 2015, 409, 707, and 708, and 606, and 751, and 305, of the former MM building B, and the former MM building B, 751, and 305, and Defendant A advertised “J” on the Internet site of “I”, “N”, “O”, and “P”. Defendant B employed female employees, including Q, while taking charge of guiding customers and managing female employees, and paid KRW 150,000,000 among them to female employees, and made female employees have sexual intercourse with female customers.