However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 4. 29. 02:15 경 울산 중구 B에 있는 'C‘ 편의점에 술에 취한 상태로 들어가 그 곳 종업원인 피해자 D(26 세 )에게 담배를 피우냐고 질문하고, 피해 자로부터 “ 담배를 피우지 않는다” 는 대답을 듣자 갑자기 피해자에게 “ 너는 좆됐다, 왜 이렇게 싸가지가 없냐,

C. The franchising of coffees cited by his hand on the floor of convenience, and franchising out of the above convenience store after receiving a 112 report, and again franchising out of the above convenience store, and franchising back to the above convenience store and franchising back to the victim again, and obstructed the victim’s convenience store operation by force for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of internal investigation reports and field photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (The fact that the criminal records of the same kind can be taken into account, the situation of the war, etc.);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;