A. The Defendant did not participate in the crime of mistake of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the testimony of witness B of the trial party, the defendant can be found to have committed the instant crime in collusion with B and C as shown in the facts charged, so this part of the defendant's allegation is without merit.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the case of unfair sentencing and the criminal defendant having the same criminal record and committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.