If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On May 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for six months from the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on May 24, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 24, 2013.

The defendant does not pay the sales price of goods to the treasury at the convenience store that he works for his employee, but does not pay it to the treasury;

1. On November 201, 201, around 08:00, by inserting KRW 200,000,000, which was received from the customers from the victims C (the older than 42) located in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, by inserting them into their own Australia money without entering the Kabter’s safe, within the D convenience points managed by the victims C (the older than 42) who are located in B;

2. From around 22:00 on January 2, 2012 to around 09:00 the following day, a person steals KRW 200,000 in cash in the manner described in paragraph (1) within the F convenience managed by the victim E (the 44 years of age) who is located in the State located in Busan Seo-gu;

3. steals 520,00 won in cash in the same manner at the places described in paragraph (2) at the end of February 2012;

4. A person steals 2,600,000 won in cash by the same method at the places specified in paragraph (2) for the first time on April 2012;

5. At around 09:00 on May 13, 2012, at the location described in paragraph (2), 200,000 won in cash located in a Kabter credit cooperative at his/her hand shall be deducted, put in his/her wall, thereby theft by means of escape;

6. Around 09:00 on May 15, 2012, the victim embezzled the Defendant in such a way that it does not transfer the cash amount of KRW 670,840, the victim left the Defendant to G company account and uses it without transferring the cash amount of KRW 670,840;

7. At around 08:00 on May 16, 2012, at the place specified in paragraph 2, 540,000 won in cash, which was located in a Kabter credit cooperative, was deducted by hand from the amount that the victim does not work at the place specified in paragraph 2, and was stolen by means of escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Previous convictions: Case search and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of larceny) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, respectively: