음성생극단지계획승인고시 무효 등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The reasoning of the judgment of this court for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the project complex of this case in Part 4, Section 3 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as "the industrial complex of this case"; (b) the 4, Section 9 through Section 15 of the 4, the 5, the 5, the 8, the 5, the "no relation," and the 8, the 5, the 5, the 8, the "no relation," and the 5, the 8, the 5, the 8, the 5, the 5, the 8, the 11, the 5, the 5, the 5, the 5, the 8, the 5, the 11,
A lawsuit seeking revocation of a disposition, etc. may be filed by a person who has a legal interest in seeking revocation of the disposition, etc., and a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the validity of the disposition, etc. may be filed by a person who has a legal interest in seeking confirmation of the existence of the disposition, etc. (Articles 12 and 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act). Even if a third party is not the direct counter-party of the administrative disposition, if the interests protected by the relevant administrative disposition are infringed by law, the party's propriety shall be determined by filing an administrative lawsuit seeking revocation or invalidity confirmation of the disposition. Here, legal interests protected by law refer to individual and specific interests protected by the relevant laws and regulations and regulations. Thus, if a third party has an indirect and indirect economic interest, there
(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2006Du330 Decided March 16, 2006, and Supreme Court Decision 97Nu1337 Decided February 8, 2000, etc.). Thus, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable. Thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.