The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. The Defendant A and G jointly committed the crime of Defendant A and G entered the “I” restaurant operated by the Busan Jung-gu Busan metropolitan Government H Victim B from April 10, 2017 to the “I” restaurant operated by the H Victim B and ordered two parts to be a national guest, but the victim “one person in principle”;

The 3 customers ordered 2 2 o's wrongs, and the bl's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h'ss h'

Boeman

The term “A” and “A” and the head of the victim A, while the victim was working in front of the restaurant, and the victim was working in front of the restaurant for the above issue, and Defendant A was working in front of the victim’s head, and the victim was on the side.

G also has the victim's head debt collection.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with G.

2. Defendants B and C committed joint crimes as above in front of the above “I” restaurant around the day set forth in paragraph 1, and Defendant B was able to obtain the victim’s head head, and Defendant C, Defendant B’s son, son, was able to keep the victim’s body and face and pushed the victim’s face.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the sixth public trial date);

1. The witness B, C, and K respective legal statements [Defendant B, and C]

1. Each legal statement of a witness A, K and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers to G;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of a punishment) concerning criminal facts;

1. Defendant B and C who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination as to the defense counsel’s assertion of the Defendants B and C under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The facts that Defendant B was able to obtain the victim’s head debt.