beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.06 2014가합23619

부정경쟁행위 등 금지청구 등

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff company is the party's position 1) The children's clothes Internet shopping mall site (www.theety.co.kr, hereinafter "Plaintiff company's shopping mall").

2) The Defendant Company A (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) operates a child-resistant Internet shopping mall site (E, F, and hereinafter “Defendant Company shopping mall”) under the name of “C” and “D,” and the Defendant B is the representative director of the Defendant Company.

B. Among children’s uniforms sold in the shopping mall of the Plaintiff Company’s shopping mall, the pictures of each of the products named as “Nice,” “Nice,” “Nice,” “Round,” “Rabrid,” “Rabrid’s house business,” and “4, par value interior uniforms” (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the products of the Plaintiff Company”) are as follows.

(1) He/she shall carry fluoride fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort interior clothes

다. 피고 회사 쇼핑몰에서 판매되고 있는 아동복 중 일부 상품의 사진 피고 회사 쇼핑몰에서 판매되고 있는 아동복 중 ① ‘미니 제이 원피스’, ② ‘색연필 가디건’, ③ ‘꼼데 베이비돌 후드 집업’, ④ ‘꼼므 실내복’이라는 각 이름의 상품들(이하 통칭할 때에는 ‘이 사건 피고 회사 상품들’이라 한다)의 사진은 아래와 같다.

① 미니 제이 원피스 ② 색연필 가디건 ③ 꼼데 베이비돌 후드 집업 ④ 꼼므 실내복 [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1호증(가지번호 포함, 가지번호 있는 것은 이하 같다), 을 제57호증의 각 기재 및 영상, 증인 G의 증언, 변론 전체의 취지

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Regarding the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act based on Article 2 subparagraph 1 (i) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion.