When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Victim B is a person who operates “D” store in C at three times, and the Defendant is a person who operates “F” store in C at three times.

The defendant and the victim have caused conflicts as a matter of attracting each other's customers while operating the same type of business in an adjacent place.

1. Around 15:50 on May 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim, who was frighted as a parking problem of tourist buses found at the victim’s shop in front of the foregoing “D”; (b) brought an assault against the victim; (c) brought an assault against the victim, she breadd the victim’s spath by bating the victim’s spath by bating the victim’s body by hand; and (d) committed assault against the victim’s body.

2. The Defendant damaged the victim’s property at the time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph, and at the time and place of the victim’s market price so as to tear.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines for crimes under Article 266 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;