beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.29 2014가합53269

매매대금

Text

1. The defendant's KRW 150,000,00 for each of the plaintiffs and 6% per annum from March 8, 2014 to September 29, 2014, respectively.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(2) Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act applicable mutatis mutandis to the application of the provisions of this Act (a judgment made by a person who is deemed as having been the original of the original payment order, the defendant served the original of the original payment order, and the written objection was submitted. The written objection submitted by the defendant is only indicated in the purport of objection against the payment order, and there is no indication of dispute over the plaintiffs' assertion. Since the defendant did not submit the written response, and did not appear at the date of pleading, the defendant did not submit the written response, and therefore, the fact that the plaintiffs' assertion was made in accordance with Article 150(3) of the