A. As to Defendant B and C, the amount of KRW 100,255,147 and KRW 69,407,120 among them, Defendant B and C jointly start on August 5, 2017.

A. The Plaintiff is a party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party-based party.

(2) Defendant B and C enforced and sold the instant loan, and Defendant D Co., Ltd (hereinafter “D”) are as follows.

As stated in the foregoing paragraph, the obligation to repair the defects of the loan of this case was guaranteed.

B. The approval for the use of the instant loan was obtained on April 8, 2016 from 14 households (6 households of business facilities, 8 households of multi-family housing), G 16 households (8 households of business facilities, 8 households of multi-family housing, 8 households of multi-family housing) of the instant loan.

C. 1) The construction of the instant Ba, while constructing the instant Ba, did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, or changed the construction or defective construction differently from the design drawing. Accordingly, the instant Bara’s sectional owners requested the repair of defects before the instant lawsuit was brought against the Defendant B and C, and the relevant defect was repaired.

3) Nevertheless, the loan of this case still remains with the same defects as the Compilation table by the section for common use and the section for exclusive use. The difference between expenses incurred in repairing it or exchange value arising therefrom shall be as indicated below in the case where the remuneration portion of the outer wall is also the same as the remuneration portion (amount to be reflected in the unit: 3. below) (the sum of the amounts to be reflected in the 15,367,578, 18, 209, 2769, 934, 398, 930, 937, 6361, 737, 47-47, 47, 47-10, 105, 515, 1414, 138, 484, 6365, 63636, 97, 97, 97, 16365, 1065, 19636, 5639, 165