The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged of this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the recognition criteria of a false fact in violation of logical and empirical rules, the notice of harm to the crime of aggression, the causal relation, the causal relation, and the principle of trial on evidence.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed, and thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.