When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on April 12, 2016, at the Jeju Western Police Station C District; (b) there was a defect that “the Defendant did not pay a taxi fare without the Defendant’s notice on the purpose; and (c) the background D said that the Defendant would return the taxi fee to the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the Defendant used police officers on duty to return home on several occasions, on the ground that “the police officers are lettered, the name of the party is changed, the party is the bad police officer, and the law of the Republic of Korea was wrong.”

However, the Defendant continued to see that “I see my mind, I will see my opinions, and see them later,” and had a riotous or disorderly speech and behavior by drinking at a public office, with the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each written statement of the E-taxi engineer and F;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. 수사보고(지구대 CCTV 영상 첨부), 지구대 CCTV 영상CD 무죄 주장에 대한 판단 피고인은 판시 범죄사실 기재 일시, 장소에서 ‘택시기사가 피고인에게 언성을 높인 부분을 조사해 달라’고 경찰에게 요청하였으나 경찰이 피고인의 이야기를 무시하였고, 이에 피고인이 경찰에게 다소 언짢은 말을 하였지만 주정하거나 큰소리로 소란을 일으킨 사실은 없다고 주장한다.

However, according to the above evidence, the defendant's assertion of innocence is without merit, since the defendant had a very rough and disorderly speech or behavior while under the influence of alcohol at a government office.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for a crime: Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; Selection of a fine;

1. Detention at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The costs of lawsuit;