2. The judgment of the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case only 45 months after the release, and the crime is not good, and there was a history of punishment several times as to the same kind and the crime of this case, and considering the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct after the crime of this case, the victim I and the court below agreed at the victim G, the agreement between the defendant and the court below, and even considering the restoration of the damage caused by fraud, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.