Examining the record in light of the relevant legal principles, the court below rejected the Defendant’s act as a justifiable act under the D Operational Rules and the Rules of Employment, for the reasons stated in its holding, and it is acceptable to find the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

Meanwhile, according to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing may be filed only where the court below rendered a sentence of death or imprisonment with or without prison labor for an indefinite term or for not less

Therefore, in this case where a more minor fine is imposed on the defendant, an appeal is not allowed to be filed with the Supreme Court for the reason that the amount of punishment is unreasonable.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.