Defendant was aware that he had been in common.

From B, the victim C (56 years) sought a statement that he was aware of the employment of his children as a member of the National Assembly as a member of the National Assembly, and tried to obtain money by fraud, such as the victim C (56 years) and the victim's children were on duty as D party, and the victim's children could be employed as a member of the National Assembly E due to their friendly relationship with the member of the National Assembly E.

1. The Defendant was aware of around 10:00 on June 23, 2016 that he had known that he had known to the general public.

B With the introduction of victims from B, "The youth chairperson of the 000 party youth, who was nearest to the son, who was known by the E member before the National Assembly, will be employed as the Ethton for the National Assembly member.

The assistant shall be personnel to the assistant officer.

The account number was 1.5 million won in remittance L, which was false.

However, there was no intention or ability to employ victims as a member of the National Assembly.

The Defendant was issued 1.5 million won to the bank account in the name of the Defendant under the pretext of teaching expenses from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around 15:00 on June 30, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at G coffee shop located on the first floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building, stating that “The victim is the chief of H I in the line, who is the head of H I in the line, is at the position of the division, and that two of the J commercial buildings located in the sports site of YI would be able to be specially sold, five million won of the down payment.”

However, the fact is that H does not work in I and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the sale of the above J commercial building.

The defendant was given 5 million won to the national bank account under the name of H, which was prepared in advance as down payment from the victim's seat, in other words, as down payment.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. The Defendant is the victim by telephone on July 2, 2016.