However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. In the meantime, the Defendant, on February 27, 2016, listened to the road front of the Daegu Bank enzymal 116, Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro, 50-ro 116, the Defendant: (a) was asked by the police officer of the victim who was dispatched after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report about the details of the report; and (b) was asked by the victim of the victim who was dispatched by the Defendant, who was asked by the police officer B about the reason for the report.

” 고 욕설을 하고, 이를 제지하는 피해자에게 “ 개 씨 발 놈 아 좃 같은 소리하고 있네.

At the next place of Korea, the victim was openly insultingd by openly obsing the victim by raising the further words “it is necessary to do so......”

2. When the Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, insultd as above, and was arrested as a current offender from B, etc. from the circumstances surrounding the Daegu East East Police Station C District Team affiliated with the police station of the Daegu East Eastern Police Station, whether the Defendant, “Il the flick, Ilish, Ilish, Ilish, Ilish, Ilish.”

C. The term “C. Drill,” refers to “S. B’s knife, knife, knife, tear, and walking the B’s bridge on a hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of a penalty (a point of insult, a choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties and a choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has no basic area (from June to one year and four months) (i.e., a person subject to special sentencing) [decision of sentence] [Judgment of sentence] of the following circumstances, the age, sex, family relation, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.