except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:20 on May 10, 2014, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, served with the report of 112 and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention, suppression, and investigation of FF, a police officer, by assaulting the Defendant, who was a police officer of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station Embow, to arrest himself in the act of assaulted by G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the G production;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the obstruction of the performance of official duties) (the scope of the sentencing guidelines];

2. Determination of sentence: (a) the sentence is not good for the crime of this case; (b) the number of force for the punishment of assault-related crimes; (c) the punishment of the same kind of fine has the power to punish the defendant; (d) the confession and reflect of the crime of this case; (e) the age and character and conduct of the defendant; and (e) the sentence shall