However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 2, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven a motor vehicle of 0.208% of alcohol alcohol concentration in blood at around 19:09, while under the influence of alcohol at around 0.208%, and, at the same time, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of hack-packed at the speed of one-lane between the two-lanes, namely, the two-lanes of alcohol level in the surface of the fisheries market at the scke of the tunnel.

Since there is a private street crossing, in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the safe operation of the steering system by checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence while under the influence of alcohol while driving at the front, took the back part of the FM3 car of the victim E (the 47-year-old driver) driving that was stopped for signal waiting at the front, as the front part of the Defendant’s hivers of the hivers of the hivers vehicle, and due to the shock, received the back part of the hives car of the victim G (the 43-year-old driver) driving that was parked in front while keeping the above SM3 passenger car ahead of the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim E and the victim G’s tensions and tensions in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and the victim I(46) and the victim J(40) suffered from each of the following: (a) the victim I(46) and the victim JJ(40) respectively: (b) the victim’s chills and tensions that require approximately two weeks’ medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol with 0.208% alcohol concentration in blood at the same time and at the same place as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3(2)8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.