However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the judgment.

The Defendants, using the fact that the intellectual ability of the victim C (24 tax) who was Defendant A’s work partner, was somewhat falling, were able to take off money by threatening the victim to keep the cell phone at the floor and by threatening the victim to keep the mobile phone as if the cell phone was broken.

Defendants, around April 6, 2018, around 18:59, around the third floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building E, Defendant A her cell phone was faced with the victim while walking together before the third floor of the Seoul Yongsan-gu Building E, and Defendant B her cell phone was damaged by the victim, and the cell phone was damaged.

In the year of the damage of a mobile phone, a fine of 2 million won has been imposed on the reduction house due to the mobile phone damage.

the police officer

Here, the agreement is reached in this match.

“If you do not know the agreed amount, you have to do so to the police as if you reported it to the police, and Defendant A has to do so to the victim.

“I am you as you see”, and Defendant B again sees the agreement to the victim.

As the police station reported, the victim, who frightened, made an agreement, called "the person who appears to reach an agreement".

Accordingly, Defendant B demanded 5 million won from the victim suffering from the 2.5 million won withdrawn by the victim at the F bank cash payment machine on the third floor near D commercial buildings under the pretext of agreement. Defendant B received 2.5 million won from the victim at the F bank cash payment machine near D commercial buildings, and was withdrawn by the victim at the 2.5 million won from the e.g., the e., the e., the e., the cash payment machine near the place.

As a result, the Defendants jointly carried the victim with the intent of “report to the police” and acquired the property equivalent to 5 million won in total from the victims of frightage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Criminal facts;