If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On November 7, 2006, the defendant was issued a summary order of 2.5 million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), a summary order of 1.5 million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Busan District Court's Dong Branch's branch's branch's branch's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's branch's branch's branch's branch's order on December 19, 2006, and a summary order of 700,000 won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Busan District Court'

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter cargo vehicles.

The Defendant, without a driver’s license on June 14, 2015, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.067% in blood, while driving the said cargo at a speed of 0.067% in the middle of blood. When driving the said cargo at the front of the road located in the top of the steel-gun in Busan, the Defendant, who was in the front of the front of the road, was driving at the speed of the air-proof speed from the front of the road to the front of the entrance. In such a case, the Defendant was driving at the front of the road at the speed of the victim C (65 years old)’s driving, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely examining the front left and left of the vehicle and driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so, was negligent in driving the victim's hurburged car and received the part of the driver's hurb in front of the cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, an injury to the victim E (V, 67 years old), such as finite fat, etc., requiring treatment for about two weeks, the victim F (V, 53 years old), the victim G (69 years old), and the victim H (V, 58 years old), respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s written statement of accident;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Main report;

1. Each written diagnosis (not less than C but four persons);

1. Previouss before ruling: Application of the law of reply to inquiries, such as criminal history.