beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.08.10 2018고정265

명예훼손

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The facts charged of this case

1. The Defendant, at around 11:00 on May 26, 2017, had a large number of employees other than E, who work as complainants, in the office of Seo-gu North-gu B and Ccheon Factory, Seocheon-gu, Inc., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ccheon-gu”).

“A person who defames a complainant by openly pointing out facts,” and continued to do so at the above location, the Defendant did not engage in funeral services to help his own children, but he did not engage in funeral services, such as E, in the place where a number of complainants are located.

D The expression "h.h.h.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.n.

2. On May 28, 2017, at around 12:30, the Defendant was in the position where Nonparty H and the members of G church I, etc. of the complainant at the parking lot for Sejong Special Self-Governing City F, G church: G church.

“Along with the fact that the complainant was aware of the fact that the complainant was born at the above place, and the complainant was divorced from his wife and 2 years, and did not have made a clerical error, the Defendant was aware of the fact at the above place, and the complainant was in the absence of the fact that the complainant was a mistake in writing. As above, Nonparty H and G church I et al. were in the place where Nonparty H and G church members I et al. were in the same place.

D took note of Na, Ma, Mada and 2 years, was divorced and entered into a clerical error in the test.

By speaking at a large interest rate, “the reputation of the complainant was undermined by openly pointing out false facts.”

Maz.

1. Although the Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, stated in Article 1 of the instant facts charged, stated that the Defendant had talked to the effect that he would help the head of the factory of the Yananananancheon Factory to have only file an accusation, and thus, examined.

The record may be accepted as follows: