When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 03:30 on October 8, 2016, while drinking alcoholic beverages together with the Victim D (39) on the ground that the victim’s horse dose does not come to mar, and (b) micker on the part of the victim’s micker, and micker kicker knife the victim’s head once in the process; and (c) again, micker knife and knife the knife.

“In the process of wearing the part of the victim’s timber toward the part of the victim’s timber and preventing the victim from selling it, the victim teared the left part of the part and the part of the part, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and led the victim to open boxes of the following arms, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognizes the criminal facts of this case, and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant.

However, in this case, even if the degree of injury was two weeks prior to the Defendant’s display of beer disease toward the victim without any particular reason while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant committed the same kind of crime even though he was punished by a fine due to robbery, assault, etc. in the past, and the Defendant committed the same offense even though he was punished by a fine due to robbery, assault, etc. or imprisonment with prison labor, and the attitude of being in the trial such as avoiding disturbance in this court is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.