beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단3604

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and is engaged in driving duties of GTS 125 Obane without a license plate.

On March 30, 2018, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of one-lane from the four-distance side of the street to the four-distance side of the light mountain, where the three-lane road in front of the D store located in Busan Metropolitan City around 18:05.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed and safety zones are installed, all drivers of motor vehicles shall drive the motor vehicle according to the signals of the motor vehicle, and when pedestrians are traveling along the crosswalk, they shall temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk so as not to obstruct or endanger the passage of the pedestrians, and there was a duty of care not to enter the safety zone.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this to enter the safety zone and got the victim E (39 tax) crossing the crosswalk from the right side of the above Obaba to the left side of the above Obaba by negligence in contravention of the signal, and let the victim E (39 tax) go beyond the road.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as an open frame of the body body body body, accompanied by a felball that requires approximately 14 weeks of treatment from the victim due to such occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph 1 at the same time, and by negligence as described in paragraph 1, the part front of the GTS 125 Obama operated by the Defendant and damaged the repair cost to the extent of KRW 13,081,229 in front of the GMW 520D car owned by the victim F.

3. On March 30, 2018, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) operated the said urine within a section of about 3 km from the 18:05 radius to the 3km road in the front of the D store located in Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si; (b) on March 30, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. The actual survey report;