beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.04.17 2013고단2496

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the E-Game on the first floor of the D building at a leisure time, and Defendant B is the person in charge of the money exchange business in the above game site, and F is the person in charge of the management of the above game site.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with F, from April 19, 2013 to February 23, 2013, calculated 10,000 won in cash by making use of a game machine installed in the said game room and obtained points from customers in the said game room, and then exchanged money after deducting 10% of the money exchange commission.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with F to exchange tangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Each protocol of seizure and list of seizure of the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Promotion of respective Game Industry Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendant A who is suspended from execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the fact that the above defendant reflects the crime of this case and the fact that the same kind of criminal record does not exist);

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 48(1) B of the Criminal Act: Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act;