beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.20 2015나1589

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim shall be dismissed at the trial.

3...

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant is a corporation established under the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Act, which carries out the training of gifteds for science and technology and industrial development, the national policy research and development, etc., and since 2012, the plaintiff is a national non-student qualification for the defendant with the government contributions to bear all or part of the expenses for the education of students.

On December 20, 1983, the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the "Advanced Institute") established with the nature of voluntary supporters' association for the provision of the defendant's insufficient educational facilities and operating expenses, and thus, it is sufficient to supplement and expand the defendant's insufficient facilities, the payment of research expenses, etc. to school teachers and staff, and the provision of expenses necessary for school operation or educational activities.

In addition, following the approval of the president of defendant president and the resolution of the board of directors, the first meeting of the board of directors was held to deliberate and decide on the budget bill for the pertinent school year, and accordingly the dues were decided.

The defendant principal issued a detailed statement to the student who intends to register in the new semester that the amount of the admission fee, tuition fee, and dues for school supporting association should be paid in a lump sum. The above detailed statement was divided into each of the detailed items of the admission fee, tuition fee, and dues for school supporting association, but the payment period and method were not different.

Accordingly, there was no case of allowing the payment of the dues for the payment of the dues separately from the admission fees or tuition fees.

The rules of this case stipulate that the guardian of the student who is attending the school shall be an ordinary member of the sexual council.

From 2012 to 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,672,00,00 in total, for each semester, to the Plaintiff’s flag membership fee (hereinafter “instant flag membership fee”).

The president of the defendant's president shall execute the budget on the dues received from the sexual council of this case.