If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

From March 29, 2016 to July 21, 2016, the Defendant obtained a rating of online game products using five computers for online games in the Southern-gu, Gwangju-gu, “C” from around March 29, 2016 to around July 21, 2016, using five computers for online games, “mon posters, Baduk, and pos” from the Game Management Committee for Game Products: “The charge charge for game money can only be made in an indirect shock method following the purchase of the naphtha, and the monthly charge shall not exceed 30,000 won,” but the Defendant provided a rating of game products different from the content of the rating. However, unlike the content of the rating, the Defendant provided the customer, who is the user, to the customer, without directly joining (i.e., ID, etc. after the real name certification) by himself/herself. The Defendant directly charged 10,000 won in cash to the manager’s ID, and provided the customer with altered game products for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each investigation report (in addition to three copies of the control circumstances and site conditions, etc., and the summary order);

1. Returns on the result of appraisal by the Game Management Committee;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to closures of field photographs and video images;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting a crime, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry, and Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;