However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 01:30 on January 7, 2018, purchased an excessive one for the purpose of using when the Defendant committed suicide while under the influence of alcohol at “D convenience store”, and then, on the ground that he was working as a convenience store employee, he would have the means to cope with robbery to the victim E (21) who is an employee of the Defendant.

On the other hand, the victim stated that “I will leave money to the face of the robbery,” and caused the victim to drink the above excessive amount (22 cm in total length, 10 cm in length on the day) which is a dangerous object under the pretext of showing a robbery demonstration, to the extent that the victim may inflict bodily harm on the victim by leaving the excessive amount (12 cm in total length, 10 cm in length on the day) in the item of the damaged person, or by leaving the victim towards the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant threatened the victim with excessive restriction, which is a dangerous thing, as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime, and the choice of imprisonment ( Consideration of the history of a crime, the risk of a crime, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (including the fact that there exists an agreement with the victim, motive for the crime, and the fact that the defendant commits an error);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation.