2. The costs of appeal shall be individually counted.

For this, only the plaintiff B, D, and the defendant appealed, and since the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to C is separated, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the plaintiffs' claim.

2. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

3. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) despite the duty of care to prevent a fire in the defendant factory, the defendant loaded a large quantity of inflammable materials, such as a tent and a ice container, etc., which is vulnerable to a fire, into a garbage loading station following the defendant factory. Since the fire in this case was left unattended on the date of the occurrence of the fire in this case, and the fire in this case occurred, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the fire in accordance with Article 750 of the Civil Act. Thus, the fire in this case is not the place where the ice container was stored, but the garbage loading station is not the place where the ice container was stored, and even according to the investigation results such as the police station or the fire station, etc., it cannot be deemed that the fire in this case was caused by the defendant's negligence, so even if the defendant's liability for damages is recognized, the defendant is not liable to compensate for damages pursuant to Article 3 of the Act on the Liability for Fire Caused by the defendant (hereinafter "Fire Liability Act").

B. The facts of the above determination and the fact-finding with respect to the head of the Gyeonggi-nam Provincial Police Agency of this Court.