2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, has a unique area for sentencing determination, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In the instant case, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s judgment. In full view of the following: (a) the developments leading up to the provision of personal information after a drunk driving and a traffic accident; (b) the circumstances after such change; (c) the degree of blood alcohol concentration; (d) the disposal of an automobile; and (e) the Defendant’s previous conviction and age environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.